B'midbar or Numbers?

B'midbar, Numbers 1:1−4:20

D'Var Torah By: Rabbi Melanie Aron

Writing about the Book of Numbers, Arnie Eisen hears the text proclaim, "Welcome to the real world…. It is not a sanctuary." He contrasts the orderly world of Leviticus with the chaos of B'midbar, a place without landmarks, whose story is recounted in a book that also seems to lack structure. Things happen: There is confrontation, even drama, but unlike in earlier books of the Torah, the story line does not progress. Instead, the text seems to double back on itself, sometimes literally, returning the Israelites to places they had visited earlier. Complaints are also repeated and when solutions are attempted, as in the appointment of seventy leaders to assist Moses, they seem as insubstantial as a mirage in the desert.

The novellas of the contemporary Israeli writer Shulamith Hareven provide a convincing depiction of the world of B'midbar. She describes a world of uncertainty, in which even Moses has a shadowy quality and the Presence of God is even more remote. It is a world in which the physical setting plays a very significant role-a real world in which progress is uncertain and day-to-day life consumes all the available energy:

An immense freedom, vast beyond human measure, hung over everything. The days had no rules and the laws of nature themselves seemed suspended. There was no longer any need to rise for work in the morning. There were no masters and no slaves. There was only the desert…. They moved from place to place in the desert, hopping back and forth among its few springs, from tamarisk to zyzyph tree, their comings and goings pointless apart from the needs of their flocks…. There was no purpose to their lives. It simply was not Egypt. They had exchanged hard labor for freedom. Slavery was over but nothing else had taken its place.

We think of ourselves as very different from the simple, ignorant wanderers of Hareven's desert tales. We think of our lives as so much more orderly and goal directed than the aimless wanderings of our ancestors. We are the spiritual descendants of those who imposed the name Numbers on this book-Numbers, implying that through measuring and counting, drawing up lists and keeping records, we can create order, imitating the great Creator of order, God.

But to me, the message of this book is that the gap between the Divine and the human is immense and that the order we can create is only partial. We can hold a vision, but we cannot hold to it: We get distracted; we become mired in small details and pressing problems; and our progress toward the ideal seems infinitesimal. We do not even have absolute control over our own bodies, and the best of our plans are often rendered insignificant by forces beyond our control.

Yet by the end of B'midbar, something significant has occurred. The Israelites have coalesced into a community. They have been successful against the Amorites and are ready to enter the Promised Land. Their experience is often our own. At times, our lives seem without form or direction. But when we find ourselves back where we started, we discover that we are not really the same as we were. We may feel as if we have been spinning our wheels, but even that has had some effect. B'midbar is ultimately a Jewish book, affirming, even in the midst of chaos and disorientation, the possibility of progress and the triumph of ideals.

For Further Reading

  • Taking Hold of Torah: Jewish Commitment and Community in America , Arnie Eisen, Indiana University Press, 1996.
  • Thirst: The Desert Trilogy, Shulamith Hareven, Mercury House, 1996.

Rabbi Melanie Aron has served Congregation Shir Hadash in Los Gatos, CA since 1990.

The Levites and the Sinai Shleppers

Daver Acher By: Susan Kittner Huntting

This spring, our congregation is celebrating its tenth anniversary, a time to revel proudly in the accomplishments of the past ten years. I was not part of the temple at its inception, but I am continually fascinated by the stories, told time and again, of its humble beginnings. Like Wandering Jews, each Friday night the first families conducted services at a different location, carting along the siddurim, a Torah, and a portable ark-the props they deemed most critical to creating a holy space.

When the founders talk about those early years, they jokingly refer to themselves as the Sinai Schleppers, although it's more than just the schlepping that they remember. The responsibilities rotated each week. Regardless of who did what, what made the experience meaningful was the fact that the enterprise belonged to everyone and that as a group, they felt responsible for the temple's growth and success.

How this "everyone does everything" operational model stands in contrast to the "differentiation of roles" model we read about in this week's Torah portion, Parashat B'midbar! God directs Moses to count all the males, except for the Levites, for the purpose of bearing arms. For the Levites, God has other plans: "You shall put the Levites in charge of the Tabernacle of the Pact, all its furnishings and everything that pertains to it; they shall carry the Tabernacle and all its furnishings; and they shall tend it." (Numbers 1:50) They are even directed to make sure that anyone who isn't one of them is kept at a distance from the Tabernacle since God promises "any outsider who encroaches shall be put to death." (Numbers 3:10)

Over the past ten years, our temple has grown beyond its populist roots. We have indeed embraced the idea of a division of labor. Together the rabbi, soloist, ritual vice president, and house and grounds vice president are doing the work of the original Sinai Schleppers. Likewise, I can imagine that by their thirteenth month together in the wilderness, the Israelites needed some organizational plan imposed on them that would harness their energies and help them prepare for the next steps in their development as a people. Surely God had good reasons for designating some of the Israelites as warriors and others as the keepers of the Tabernacle.

But I can't help wonder: What if there were Levites who were bored and found no satisfaction in repeatedly setting up and breaking down the Tabernacle, who would rather have been honored by being designated for battle? And what about those descendants of Gad or Reuben who had deep religious feelings and would have been delighted to serve in the Tabernacle instead of preparing to fight future enemies?

Likewise, what about those in our congregations today who would love to give a d'var torah but are afraid to do so because "that's what the rabbi does" or who would enjoy contributing to the music of the service but are kept at a distance because "that's the soloist's job"?

How might designating specific job responsibilities, as God directs, be beneficial to a growing and developing people? How might this be good for its individuals as well? Is there a risk to being so prescriptive? What kinds of interests and efforts might get lost in the process? And lastly, how can we achieve a functional balance?

Although God may have had good reasons for dividing up the jobs in the wilderness, I think maybe it's time to revive the Sinai Schleppers.

Susan Kittner Huntting is the Religious School Director at Temple Sinai in Sarasota, Florida.

Reference Materials

B'midbar, Numbers 1:1-4:20
The Torah: A Modern Commentary, pp. 1,028-1,043; Revised Edition, pp. 897-916;
The Torah: A Women's Commentary, pp. 787-814

Originally published: