Skip to main content
D'Var Torah By:
Rabbi Lea Mühlstein

In the ancient narrative of Joseph, we find a striking paradox. Pharoah's courtiers, the epitome of power and prestige, are bypassed in favour of a foreign slave with no apparent credentials. Yet, it is precisely Joseph's lack of titles, lineage, and worldly authority that makes him an attractive candidate to lead Egypt. Joseph's vulnerability becomes the medium through which the divine can be seen. As the Torah tells us: 

"Pharaoh said to his courtiers, 'Could we find anyone like this, a man in whom is the spirit of God?' Then Pharaoh said to Joseph, 'Since God has made all this known to you, there is none so discerning and wise as you. You shall be in charge of my palace…'" (Gen. 41:38-40)

Ruth Brin - a pioneering American Jewish poet whose work functions as a kind of modern midrash, reading biblical moments through lived experiences of the Jewish people - gives this moment its theological shape. In her poem on Joseph, published in The Torah: A Women's Commentary, she writes that:

"The nakedness of Joseph before the Pharaoh was a nakedness which both exposes and protects… the nakedness of the Jew in history… neither to escape nor embrace, but to accept, if it comes, as we have done in every age."

Brin's image is exacting. She does not describe humiliation, but a state of spiritual bareness in which nothing stands between the self and truth. In the biblical imagination, decisive encounters often come when a person stands without protection: Moses - who will only appear later in the book of Exodus - famously meets the divine after leaving behind the power and privilege of Pharaoh's court, at a burning bush in the wilderness. Joseph, in his own generation, stands before Pharaoh with no identity but his insight. And Brin understands this not merely as Joseph's moment, but as a recurring condition in Jewish existence: across history, Jews have repeatedly found themselves exposed in this way - neither fully protected nor entirely powerless, yet compelled to stand with clarity and courage in the space that remains.

Modern psychology offers a parallel language for what Brin describes, illuminating the inner strength that can arise in moments of exposure. Drawing on years of research into human resilience, Dr. Brené Brown describes vulnerability as "the birthplace of courage." Her insight helps name the strength within moments of exposure, yet Brin points to something more historically particular: across Jewish history, clarity has often arisen not from safety but from living truthfully within conditions that cannot be controlled.

This dynamic - clarity gained in conditions of exposure - is not only biblical or psychological; it is woven throughout Jewish history. Jews arrived in Rome in the second century BCE, forming one of the oldest continuous communities of the Diaspora. Their endurance never depended on secure protection. Under empire and Church, their civic position shifted repeatedly, yet they produced a distinct Italian Jewish culture marked by intellectual curiosity, theological creativity, and deep rootedness.

The early modern ghettos of Venice, Rome, Florence, and elsewhere made this condition literal. Confinement was real, but so was the cultural vibrancy that developed within those walls. Italian Jews lived close to power while remaining outside its shelter. Their identity stayed sharp because it was never fully insulated.

Even emancipation did not resolve the precariousness of belonging. In 1938, Fascist Italy enacted racial laws, expelling Jews from schools, professions, and public life. Communities woven intimately into Italian culture were suddenly unprotected. Brin's "nakedness" became legal reality. Yet in the aftermath of the Shoah and the war, Italian Jews rebuilt once more - clear-eyed and without illusion. As Primo Levi, Auschwitz survivor and one of Italy's most important post-war Jewish voices, wrote: "If understanding is impossible, knowing is necessary." Renewal came not from forgetting, but from the sober knowledge of power's instability and the refusal to confuse security with identity.

It is within this long story of endurance that the emergence of Italian Progressive Judaism must be understood. Rather than a foreign innovation, it is the latest expression of an Italian Jewish voice shaped by clarity within exposure. Lev Chadash in Milan, soon to celebrate 25 years, has created a Judaism that is egalitarian, intellectually serious, and spiritually warm - an expression of Jewish life that speaks confidently in a Catholic-majority society. The Federazione Italiana per l'Ebraismo Progressivo (FIEP) - the Italian equivalent of the URJ, approaching its 10th anniversary, brings coherence and recognition to communities in Milan, Rome, Florence, and other cities, offering a national structure grounded in openness and equality.

These communities do not claim the comfort of numbers or institutional dominance. They choose presence. Their voice is not defensive but articulate, contributing to Italian public discourse with ethical clarity. In this, they echo Joseph: standing without armour, grounded enough that truth can be heard.

Seen through Brin's lens, their existence is neither triumphalist nor fragile. When a community stands without illusions of guaranteed power, what remains visible is what matters: purpose, learning, integrity, and a living connection to God.

Mikeitz leaves us with a demanding invitation: to ask what we might see - in ourselves, in God, in our communities - if we dared to stand as Joseph did, unguarded and truthful, allowing spiritual clarity to emerge.

Originally published: